Jeff,
Here are the resources I mentioned in the call.
https://build.allseenalliance.org/ci/view/Core%20RB16.04%20SDK/ contains
all of the SDKs
https://build.allseenalliance.org/ci/view/Core%20RB16.04%20SDK/job/branch-osx-sdk/
is the OSX SDK
https://build.allseenalliance.org/ci/view/Core%20RB16.04%20SDK/job/branch-osx-sdk/configure-readonly/
shows the build steps
Ry


On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Blayney, Jeff <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Way,
>
>
>
> We are currently pursuing your recommendation of using the new alljoyn
> 16.04 router in windows 10. We will let you know what happens.
>
>
>
> Lioy,
>
>
>
> I have a meeting conflict, however our android developer Jon Mozzetta will
> attend to answer any questions about these bugs that we are seeing. As a
> short answer to your inquiry – we were seeing the multipoint issue (bug
> #49) in the scenario outlined in the bug itself. It is around the network
> disconnect/connect scenario – our program would never recover due to this
> bug.
>
>
>
> https://jira.allseenalliance.org/browse/ASACORE-49
>
>
>
> https://jira.allseenalliance.org/browse/ASACORE-3053 - (new bug logged
> for leaveHostedSession issue on non-multipoint)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Way Vadhanasin [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:43 PM
> *To:* Lioy, Marcello <[email protected]>; Blayney, Jeff <
> [email protected]>; [email protected]
> *Cc:* Poole, Gary <[email protected]>; Cazier, Robb P (CEPS SW
> Development) <[email protected]>; Mozzetta, Jonathan <
> [email protected]>; Truong, Binh <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* RE: [Allseen-core] Multipoint Re-joining bug
>
>
>
> Hello Jeff,
>
>
>
> I’d like to learn more the issue(s) you're having in non-muiltipoint
> configuration, specifically after your switch to more recent windows 10
> build in the Windows 10 Insider program. These recent Windows 10 builds
> have the AllJoyn router based on the 16.04 release, which received a number
> of fixes notably related to router deadlocks and the ECDHE_SPEKE
> authentication mechanism (the ones you are currently using unfortunately
> are in the deprecation path).
>
>
>
> Also as I recommended previously, please consider using the asynchronous
> version of the session API (particularly when joining a session). It worked
> much better in out testing.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Way
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Lioy, Marcello <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, June 29, 2016 3:58 PM
> *To: *Blayney, Jeff <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> *Cc: *Poole, Gary <[email protected]>; Cazier, Robb P (CEPS SW
> Development) <[email protected]>; Mozzetta, Jonathan
> <[email protected]>; Truong, Binh <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [Allseen-core] Multipoint Re-joining bug
>
>
>
> Jeff,
>
>
>
> As I mentioned on Slack it would be great if you could join the triage
> meeting tomorrow and explain what you are doing and how this impacts you
> that will help make the case for fixing the issue.  The trick will be to
> find someone that can make the fix.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Blayney,
> Jeff
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2016 3:05 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* Poole, Gary <[email protected]>; Cazier, Robb P (CEPS SW
> Development) <[email protected]>; Mozzetta, Jonathan <
> [email protected]>; Truong, Binh <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Allseen-core] Multipoint Re-joining bug
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I was hoping to lobby a higher priority for the bug listed below. We
> intermittently could not rejoin a multipoint session, and this broke our
> application for these cases with no simple workaround. We have since
> switched to non-multipoint as a workaround, however that has its own unique
> issues and challenges. We would like to be able to go back to multipoint at
> some point.
>
>
>
>
> https://jira.allseenalliance.org/browse/ASACORE-49?jql=project%20%3D%20%22Core%20SW%22%20AND%20(component%20in%20(%22Router%2FSCL%22%2C%20SCONS)%20OR%20component%20is%20EMPTY)%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20closed%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Postponed%20OR%20status%20not%20in%20(closed%2C%20resolved)%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug)%20ORDER%20BY%20Severity%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20id%20ASC
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> -Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Allseen-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.allseenalliance.org/mailman/listinfo/allseen-core
>
>
_______________________________________________
Allseen-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.allseenalliance.org/mailman/listinfo/allseen-core

Reply via email to