Hi, Yes, it does reduce the risk. Thank you for the update. I will not implement the non-xml api.
George On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Lioy, Marcello <[email protected]> wrote: > All., > > > > We discussing in the CWG meeting earlier today and the conclusion was to > omit the non-XML bindings. Jorge will be refactoring his commit (after > abandoning it) to include only the non-XML and will provide a different > gerrit item with the non-XML for future reference (i.e. it too will be > abandoned with comments along the lines of it being there for reference > should there be a desire to add that functionality to the Obj-C binding > down the line. > > > > George, does only delivering the XML reduce the risk of the work not > completing by next week? That was one of the rationales for omitting that > from the API for 16.10). > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *George Tang > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2016 7:16 PM > *To:* Josh Spain <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Allseen-core] Non-XML vs XML APIs for Security 2.0 > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm working on the Java bindings for security 2.0. Currently, there is a > commit for the SecurityApplication interface. This commit includes > PermisisonConfigurator and the SecurityApplicationProxy. There were some > dependencies that I didn't want to spend time on different commits. > > > > https://git.allseenalliance.org/gerrit/#/c/8757/8 > > > > The majority of securityapplicationproxy is implemented, and some of > PermissionConfigurator is implemented. There is some risk of not getting > this done by next week, but I am committed to finishing this before the > deadline. > > > > George > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Josh Spain <[email protected]> wrote: > > Core Team, > > > > We have internally reviewed the Non-XML vs. the XML APIs for Security 2.0 > in C++, Objective-C, and Java. > > > > For all three languages the Non-XML bindings are much more natural to the > programmer. However, the XML bindings could also potentially be useful. > > > > Here is the current implementation status: > > *Language* > > *Non-XML* > > *XML* > > C++ > > Implemented > > Implemented > > Objective-C > > Implemented > > Implemented > > Java > > In Progress > > In Progress > > > > I believe many of these have been pushed and reviewed, but I'm not certain > of the merge status. > > > > @Affinegy team, anyone who has any more updates on this please speak up. > > > > Thanks, > > Josh > > Josh Spain > Director of Engineering Affinegy, Inc. > t.512-535-1700 x1006 > a. 1705 S Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 310, Austin, TX 78746 USA > Website <http://affinegy.com> > > > > Email <[email protected]> > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/joshspain> > > > > <http://twitter.com/affinegy> > > > > Latest Tweet: <https://twitter.com/Affinegy> > > > > Texas is it. Realy. Check out 11 Reasons Why Everyone Wants to Move to > Texas - U.S. Global Investors, https://t.co/3Q3pt3dSlv ( #USFunds > <https://twitter.com/USFunds> > > > > ) > > Read More <https://twitter.com/Affinegy/statuses/772149067178647552> > > > > <https://twitter.com/Affinegy> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Allseen-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.allseenalliance.org/mailman/listinfo/allseen-core > > >
_______________________________________________ Allseen-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.allseenalliance.org/mailman/listinfo/allseen-core
