Hi Dave,

On 22.08.2012 20:00, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Patches:  Perhaps I am not understanding the problem clearly.  Are you
> talking about a ticket in your "Patches" tracker?  E.g.
> https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/patches/171/  On there I can see the
> attached patch file and can open it fine.  If you are subscribed to a
> ticket, you should get an email when a file is attached.  It'll have the
> attachment metadata, but not the whole file included.  Emailing the
> attachments could be a problem if they are very large.  Can you provide
> an example if I'm not on the right track here?
Maybe the following helps understand the built  "attitude/expectation" better: 
when following a
project like ooRexx over the years as a former/potential developer it is 
important to learn about
*all* supplied patches and *all* commits in general. Then, if patches, commits 
occur it used to be
the case that an e-mail including the diffs got sent out via a 
relay-e-mail-list and anyone who
subsribed to that e-mail list received it. Now, the diffs embedded in the 
e-mail would not be
necessary, if the e-mail contained a list of files that got changed each with a 
link to get to its
diff (and ultimately one link that would present all diffs at once). For study 
purposes or merely
documentation printing out those diffs (either physically or as a pdf) is 
important, if an area got
changed that one has special interest in.

Following a specific tracker item needs the prerequisite, that one learns that 
a tracker item got
created in the first place, which is quite cumbersome. [In the example
"https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/patches/171/"; one would be able to get access 
to the patch
attachment, but I have not found a way to display it inline with color 
highlighting.]

So maybe the bottom line would be: allow for sending out any patch (and commit) 
via a relay
e-mail-list, which can be subscribed by interested parties. This would allow 
for a push model, where
one would be informed that a patch (commit) got submitted/applied. If that 
e-mail contained the
aforementioned links to get to diffs (on each file or optionally having one big 
diff for all
affected files), then this would be great!

> Sorting bugs:  There is a ticket
> https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/4596/ for making the sort order
> oldest-first by default.  Several people have voted for it already, so
> we'll probably get to it soon.  Of course, patches are welcome too :)
>
> After you do a search, there is a 'Help' button near the search box.
> That help box details the fields available for searching and sorting
> (near the bottom of that help box).
Thank you, yes, I have studied the help box. (It seems that now the initial 
order of the bug tracker
is newest first, oldest last, which is great! However, when doing a search on 
the bug tracker
system, the order is oldest first, newest last.)

Here there would be the following ideas/requests: allow for displaying the 
column "reported_by_s"
and in addition allow/show a field/column "reported on".and "mod_date_dt".

Also, in general a RFE (not sure whether I should open a ticket for it) for 
sorting: how about
having a popup (like the field popup where one can determine which fields to 
display) that displays
all sortable fields which one can activate for sorting (having a radio button 
group of "ascending",
"descending", "none") and which allows to move the fields up and down to 
determine the sorting
order, if sorting should be done on more than one field and make it saveable 
for the user as well?
(If such a definable sort order becomes available, then it should be applied on 
search results as well.)


> Commit diffs in emails:  I see there are a lot of votes and comments on
> https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/2922/  I assume many are from
> ooRexx developers.  It certainly is on our radar due to that, and
> something we'd like to add.  When subscribed (btw, admins are
> automatically subscribed to all tools including SVN) emails will be sent
> with each commit, including a link to view the diff.
Maybe making this feature available for regular users (maybe as an option to 
activate) would already
solve this requeust?

> In the mean time, you could consider using the RSS feed at
> https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/feed  I know that's not as good
> as an email.  We also want to get svn-notify available as a post-commit
> hook, but it isn't available yet.
Great, thank you, looking forward to it!

Maybe a last pointer: personally, I have been active in many opensource 
projects to the point, where
I am totally "overdrawn". Therefore it is extremely helpful to get 
notifications (but also to be
able to turn them off, if too many come along).

---

Ad "patches are welcome": please believe me, if I had time available, I would 
love to help!
Unfortunately, at this time I have been overwhelmed with too much work and 
projects and simply do
not have the resources free to help personally in this interesting project. The 
only thing I can do
at the moment is trying to give constructive feedback and trying to explain the 
reasons why I would
request something that seems to be very importang/helpful as a person who has 
been following and
participating in sourceforge projects for many years. [I think everyone on the 
ooRexx development
team is courageous, adventerous and constructively trying to adopt the new 
Allura system. It seems
that this is of mutual benefit bringing experienced opensource developers 
together to help each other!]

---rony



> On 8/22/12 6:15 AM, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> having been many years interested/active in 
>> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/> I have
>> experienced the project's switch to Allura.
>>
>> The project is a long standing one, which means that the trackers have quite 
>> a few entries and
>> developers have been accustomed to learning/seeing/printing code diffs right 
>> away to make it easy to
>> study what got changed.
>>
>> After some time of using the new system (to get accustomed to it) there are 
>> many, many
>> questions/problems opened, some of which can be answered/solved on the 
>> ooRexx developer list, some
>> via Allura-trackers, but it seems for very important aspects of a developer 
>> system, there is (yet?)
>> no solution or knowledge available.
>>
>> Therefore I would like to kindly request comments/hints/pointers to the 
>> following three items, that
>> are coming into ones way, being accustomed to the old system and not having 
>> found the counterparts
>> in the new Allura:
>>
>>     -------- Original Message --------
>>     Subject:         [Oorexx-devel] Ad Allura interface: a few questions ...
>>     Date:    Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:50:29 +0200
>>     From:    Rony G. Flatscher
>>     Reply-To:        Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List 
>> <[email protected]>
>>     To:      Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List 
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Sorry, if this has been answered already, just do not know the latest 
>> state.
>>
>>       * Ad Patches: it is possible (following Mark's directions) to 
>> subscribe Patch messages by
>>         merely pressing the envelope symbol on the Patch UI. However, how 
>> would one be able to see
>>         the patch file (the diffs) from such a message?
>>           o One (a little bit cumbersome) way is to look in the left pane of 
>> commits and somehow
>>             pick the right commit from the bullet list that appears after a 
>> while in the center
>>             pane. However, once one gets to the diff page and tries to print 
>> it, the printout does
>>             not contain any of the nicely formatted code! :(
>>
>>       * Ad Bugs: is it possible to get the opening date, the submitter, such 
>> that one becomes able
>>         to sort by them as well. It is strange that the order of showing 
>> tracker entries is from
>>         oldest to latest, rather than the other way round (maybe the 
>> developers only use small
>>         databases where the order does not matter for them, but in a long 
>> standing project one may
>>         have hundreds, maybe more tracker entries).
>>
>>       * Ad svn commit diffs: it would be great, if the commit message 
>> contained links directly to
>>         the files that got committed with links to diffs. (The same would be 
>> helpful for any code
>>         submission, including the patches).
>>
>>     Is there anything I could do to help get the above items 
>> tackled/resolved somehow?
>>
>>     ---rony
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any comments/hints/pointers (maybe time frames to 
>> expect feature changes that
>> could help)!
>>
>> N.B.: Please excuse my addressing this to allura-users and allura-dev, as I 
>> do not know which e-mail
>> list is appropriate for such questions.
>>
>> ---rony

Reply via email to