El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 19:16 -0400, Dave Brondsema escribió: > I found http://bitergia.com/public/reports/gnomeshell/README which looks like > it > outlines a lot of the commands and dependencies you use.
Yes, one of our goals is to give the data we use to build our reports. Transparency :) And also, in some cases like this basic reports, the methodology so you can also reproduce it. Cheers! > > On 9/13/12 4:01 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote: > > On 9/11/12 3:37 PM, Alvaro del Castillo wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> Time to update Allura community about our progress with Metrics Tools: > >> > >>> Ok. So next steps: > >>> > >>> - We are expanding the kind of graphs we support and also the metrics. > >>> We will integrate them in our Allura module. > >> > >> You can see our M0 (Milestone0 reports at) GNOME Shell sample: > >> > >> * SCM and ITS analysis integrated > >> http://bitergia.com/public/reports/gnomeshell/M0.html > >> > >> * Different isolates graphs showing also SCM and ITS activity. > >> http://bitergia.com/public/reports/gnomeshell/milestone0.html > >> > >> We are working in some other visualizations, like comparing in the same > >> graph issues and commits: > >> > >> http://bitergia.com/public/reports/gnomeshell/commits-issues.html > > > > Nice graphs. Previously your examples had been shown as graphs within > > Allura, > > right? These look like static HTML. Is something different here? > > > > Gnome shell is a git repo, right? Does the reporting work with other repo > > types? > > > >>> > >>> - Control metrics tools execution from taskd. > >> > >> I am not sure if the tools execution should be programmed using taskd. > >> What do you think? > > > > How do you run them now? If taskd doesn't run them automatically after each > > commit, maybe a cron job would be a good way to deploy it. I think > > end-users > > could be okay with reports that are generated daily. > > > >> > >> > >>> > >>> - Allura project configuration to enable graphs and auto configure the > >>> metrics tools to use the Allura backends. > >> > >> We have improved Bicho tool, the ticket/issues gathering engine, so now > >> it supports Allura Tickets completely and using incremental queries, so > >> after the first analysis, it is really quick to reanalyze the tickets > >> for a project and create the JSON files with the data needed to graph > >> the tickets activity. > > > > Cool > > > >> > >> Right now we are working in the configuration of tools inside Allura. > >> > >> Our plan is to continue working in a Allura for at Github and once the > >> Metrics Module is in good state, where is the best place to coordinate > >> the future development? > >> > > > > Is https://github.com/Bitergia/AlluraBitergiaMetrics the right repo for me > > to be > > looking at? > > > > An earlier email mentioned R is used for some of the statistics. Could you > > point me to where that is used in the code? Or a brief explanation of > > dependencies in email is cool too. > > > > This mailing list is a good place to talk about development, just like > > you're > > doing :) Out of curiosity, are you interested in this for general purpose > > availability, or specifically interested in SourceForge being able to adopt > > this? I'm sure we'd be interested in getting it up and running, which is > > why > > I'm asking about supported SCMs, dependencies, scalability, etc :) > > > > > > > > > > > -- |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo San Félix [o] [o] [email protected] - Chief Technical Officer (CTO) | V | http://www.bitergia.com | | "Bridging the gap between developers and stakeholders" -ooo-ooo-
