Stefano, Could a user simply not fill in the personal info fields they don't wish to share? What is the value of entering that info but then not displaying it; to encourage users to enter it if only for our edification?
Thanks, Cory On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Stefano Invernizzi < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I recently pushed some new commits allowing a single user to hide his or > her personal statistics. I and Simone implemented it since some users may > prefer not to show this data. In that case, data is still available for > their personal use. However, if you think we should not allow users to do > this, we can simply put it back as it was. > As usual, we hope to get some feedbacks from you about this, as well as > about the rest of submitted code. > It would be great for us if the code could be reviewed and, if you think it > would be useful, included on the forge before we complete the thesis we are > working on. > Thank you very much! > Stefano > > > 2013/2/2 Stefano Invernizzi <[email protected]> > > > Hi, > > Yes, you are right! I changed the name of the parameter in the > > configuration file, but I forgot to do the same in the test.ini file, > > therefore all our tests resulted in errors or failures. I changed the > > parameter in that file and now it looks like everything is ok. I'm sorry > > about that. > > > > Stefano > > > > > > 2013/2/1 Tim Van Steenburgh <[email protected]> > > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> I've started to look at this again. Getting several errors and failures > >> running `nosetests` in ForgeUserStats. Can you look into that? > >> > >> Tim > >> > >> > >> On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks guys! I'm in the middle of another code review at the moment, > >> but I'll take a look soon. > >> > > >> > Tim > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Stefano Invernizzi wrote: > >> > > >> > > Dear Tim, > >> > > After fixing the issues you reported in your first review, we also > >> fixed > >> > > other things today and we committed them to the repository. > >> > > We hope this improves our code. We also implemented the loop to > >> register > >> > > additional listeners, as I had explained in the discussion of the > >> ticket a > >> > > few days ago. Particularly, we forced the parameter in the > >> configuration > >> > > file to be the equal to the entry point name, followed by ".enable", > >> so > >> > > that the whole mechanism can be easily extended. > >> > > Let us know what you think about this additional commits and if > there > >> other > >> > > things to be improved. Thank you again for your review! > >> > > > >> > > Stefano & Simone > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 2013/1/18 Tim Van Steenburgh <[email protected] (mailto: > >> [email protected])> > >> > > > >> > > > Stefano & Simone, > >> > > > > >> > > > I've posted a first review of the User stats code on > >> > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/5453/. > >> > > > > >> > > > Tim Van Steenburgh > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Tim Van Steenburgh > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Stefano & Simone, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Sorry for the delay, a lot of us were on extended vacation for > the > >> > > > Christmas holiday. I've begun looking at your branch and intend to > >> provide > >> > > > some feedback in the near future. Thanks for your contribution to > >> Allura! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Tim Van Steenburgh > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Stefano Invernizzi > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Dear all, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > We still didn't get any feedback about the uploaded code. > >> Please, let > >> > > > us > >> > > > > > know what you think about it and if there's something we can > >> improve. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Simone & Stefano > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > 2012/12/13 Stefano Invernizzi <[email protected] > (mailto: > >> [email protected]) (mailto: > >> > > > [email protected] (mailto: > >> [email protected]))> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear all, > >> > > > > > > Since yesterday the code is available on the repository. As > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > suggested in > >> > > > > > > the proposed code contributors policy, I created a new > branch > >> named > >> > > > > > > si/5453. Feel free to comment our work, and send feedbacks > or > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > suggestions > >> > > > > > > about possible improvements. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Stefano & Simone > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > 2012/12/11 Simone Gatti <[email protected] (mailto: > >> [email protected]) (mailto: > >> > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]))> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear all, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > thank you for your feedback!! > >> > > > > > > > First of all, in the next hours we'll create a branch with > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > extension > >> > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > UserStats, so that you can see our code to discuss it and > >> its > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > possible > >> > > > > > > > improvements. After that we'll upload the extensions of > the > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Organization > >> > > > > > > > and OrganizationStats. > >> > > > > > > > About the possibility to define an organization based on a > >> shared > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > topic of > >> > > > > > > > interest, we have not considered it. We assumed that the > >> kind of > >> > > > > > > > organization could be: "for-profit business", "foundation > >> or other > >> > > > > > > > non-profit organization" or "research and/or education > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > institution", like > >> > > > > > > > the organizations in the real world. We don't know if the > >> concept > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > is the > >> > > > > > > > same, in that case we can easily add a new type of > >> organization. > >> > > > > > > > (e.g."group of interest"). > >> > > > > > > > As for Rich's proposal it's a great idea! We have > >> considered it > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > but we > >> > > > > > > > later decided to focus on other aspects in our thesis. > >> Anyway it's > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > > best > >> > > > > > > > way to use the additional data included in the profile. > >> > > > > > > > I don't have commit access on the repository to upload my > >> code. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Since we > >> > > > > > > > developed it together, Stefano will commit it. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Simone. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2012/12/10 Alvaro del Castillo <[email protected] (mailto: > >> [email protected]) (mailto: > >> > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]))> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Simone, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > First of all, I am sorry about the delayed response. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > El jue, 29-11-2012 a las 19:06 +0100, Simone Gatti > >> escribió: > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > During the last weeks, while discussing our work on > >> including > >> > > > new > >> > > > > > > > details > >> > > > > > > > > > in users' profiles on the forge, I and Stefano > >> Invernizzi also > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > continued > >> > > > > > > > > > working on the other features we introduced in one of > >> our first > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > messages > >> > > > > > > > > on > >> > > > > > > > > > the mailing list, back in July. > >> > > > > > > > > > Now we have completed the implementation of these > >> tools, and > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > we would > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > like > >> > > > > > > > > > to get feedbacks from you in order to check if it's > >> possible to > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > include > >> > > > > > > > > > them on the Allura platform. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The additional features we implemented consist of two > >> main > >> > > > parts. > >> > > > > > > > First > >> > > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > > all, we included the concept of organization, namely > >> companies, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > foundations > >> > > > > > > > > > or other non-profit organizations and research and > >> education > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > institutions. > >> > > > > > > > > > Each organization is now allowed to create a profile, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > including some > >> > > > > > > > > > details about it, like a description, its working > >> fields, its > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > size, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > etc... > >> > > > > > > > > > . Moreover, users can be linked to the organizations > >> they > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > belong to, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > projects can be linked to the organizations developing > >> them. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > For both > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > these > >> > > > > > > > > > kinds of relationships, we implemented a two-way > >> mechanism: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > the user > >> > > > > > > > > > requests to be registered as a member of the > >> organization and > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > organization has to confirm it, or vice-versa. > >> Similarly, an > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > organization > >> > > > > > > > > > sends a request to be listed as the developer of a > >> project, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > and the > >> > > > > > > > > > administrator of the project has to accept it, or > >> vice-versa. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > When a > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > user > >> > > > > > > > > > leaves an organization, he can set this on the forge, > >> and the > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > enrollment > >> > > > > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > > > this organization will be shown as a past membership. > >> The same > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > applies > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > > > project collaborations: an organization can freely > set a > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > collaboration > >> > > > > > > > > > within a project as completed, because the > organization > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > doesn't want > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > > continue working on the project, and it will be shown > >> as a past > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > involvement. > >> > > > > > > > > > We believe this features could be very useful on a > >> forge which > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > is > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > used by > >> > > > > > > > > > more than one organization, because it allows to have > a > >> better > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > awareness > >> > > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > > the community, knowing how users working on a project > >> are > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > organized in > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > real life. It can also increase trust for those > projects > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > developed by > >> > > > > > > > > > well-known organizations. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The second feature we developed is related to users, > and > >> > > > consits of a > >> > > > > > > > set > >> > > > > > > > > > of metrics gathered from their activity. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > This is a really interesting thing for me! > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > These metrics include the number > >> > > > > > > > > > of created or modified artifacts (also separated for > >> different > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > kinds > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > > > artifacts), the number of assigned tickets, solved > >> tickets and > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "revoked" > >> > > > > > > > > > tickets, namely tickets which were assigned to a user > >> but > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > whose owner > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > was > >> > > > > > > > > > later changed. Moreover, the number of commits is > >> collected, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > together > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > > > the total number of added or modified lines of code by > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > user. For a > >> > > > > > > > > > certain user, all these metrics are shown on a page on > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > form, as a > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > total > >> > > > > > > > > > value since the user's registration, as well as an > >> average > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > per-month > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > value. > >> > > > > > > > > > The metrics are also calculated considering the last > 30 > >> days > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > only, in > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > order > >> > > > > > > > > > to allow to check whether the user is still active on > >> the > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > forge or > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > not, > >> > > > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > if he is increasing his efforts on the forge or not. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is this code already available? > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > In Bitergia our main focus is analyzing software > projects > >> using > >> > > > metrics > >> > > > > > > > > and we are integrating some of our tools in Allura. We > >> are using > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > > > > different approach from you, getting the metrics from a > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > consolidated > >> > > > > > > > > database that gathers the data from Allura, but at the > >> end, the > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > metrics > >> > > > > > > > > are really similar. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We are working in different kind of visualization also, > >> so we > >> > > > can share > >> > > > > > > > > also here experiences. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Moreover, it is also possible to see these values for > a > >> single > >> > > > > > > > category > >> > > > > > > > > > only, namely considering all the data regarding > projects > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > tagged as > >> > > > > > > > > > belonging to that category. A graph showing the number > >> of > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > joined > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > projects > >> > > > > > > > > > by the user for each category is also shown, to > >> highlight the > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > kind of > >> > > > > > > > > > applications the user is focused on. > >> > > > > > > > > > Finally, the previously listed statistics are also > >> calculated > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > for > >> > > > > > > > > > organizations, by considering the activity of the > users > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > enrolled in > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > organization itself. Particularly, since each user can > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > possibly work > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > > > more than one organization on the forge, as well as > >> working as > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > an > >> > > > > > > > > > individual programmer, organizations' statistics are > >> calculated > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > considering > >> > > > > > > > > > only those activities performed by its members on > >> projects to > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > which > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > organizatione is explicitely involved. > >> > > > > > > > > > We think these features are useful to allow users to > >> have a > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > deeper > >> > > > > > > > > > awareness of someone else's experience and interests, > >> and this > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > could > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > also > >> > > > > > > > > > help in identifying partners for a certain project. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > These features are implemented as external features > and > >> can be > >> > > > easily > >> > > > > > > > > > enabled or disabled by setting boolean parameters in > >> the .ini > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > file. > >> > > > > > > > > > Therefore, it is possible to enable organizations > only, > >> without > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > including > >> > > > > > > > > > the statistics features, or including statistics for > >> users > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > only, and > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > so > >> > > > > > > > > on. > >> > > > > > > > > > Of course, it is not possible to enable organization > >> statistics > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > without > >> > > > > > > > > > enabling the concept of organization on the forge. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > We would like to know what you think about these > >> features, and > >> > > > we > >> > > > > > > > would > >> > > > > > > > > > like to know how we can provide you our code to get a > >> feedback > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > from > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > you > >> > > > > > > > > > and, eventually, to discuss improvements and changes > on > >> it. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think it is a really good use case por the code > >> contributors > >> > > > policy > >> > > > > > > > > proposed in the mailing list. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Stefano is now > >> > > > > > > > > > allowed to write on the repositoy, but since I am not > >> allowed > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > to do > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > so, > >> > > > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > > > since these features should obviously be discussed > >> before being > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > included > >> > > > > > > > > on > >> > > > > > > > > > the project, I don't know if working there, even on a > >> new > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > branch, is > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > > > best solution. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think so. Create a new experimental branch and upload > >> the code > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > > > > Allura so for others developers like me, it is easy to > >> start > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > playing > >> > > > > > > > > with it. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Also, let us know if you prefer to check the two > >> features > >> > > > > > > > > > separately or not. Probably, it would be easier to do > it > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > incrementally, > >> > > > > > > > > > considering one of them at a time. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Simone Gatti and Stefano Invernizzi > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo > >> > > > > > > > > [o] [o] [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > >> (mailto:[email protected]) - CTO, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Software Engineer > >> > > > > > > > > | V | http://www.bitergia.com > >> > > > > > > > > | | > >> > > > > > > > > -ooo-ooo- > >> > > > > > > > > |\_____/| Alvaro del Castillo > >> > > > > > > > > [o] [o] [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > >> (mailto:[email protected]) - CTO, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Software Engineer > >> > > > > > > > > | V | http://www.bitergia.com > >> > > > > > > > > | | > >> > > > > > > > > -ooo-ooo- > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > -- ==== This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.
