Although not a committer, I am willing to stay on as a member-lurker on the PMC. On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Roberto Galoppini <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Jim. > > For committers, while you're at casting your vote if you do not want to be > part of the new PMC please speak up, otherwise by saying +1 you're also > saying you'd like to be part of the new PMC. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > Roberto > > > 2014-03-04 15:45 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: > >> It's most likely better to ask... >> >> No worries! :) >> >> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini < >> roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural >>>>> candidate! >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>>> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies... >>>> >>>> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC? >>> >>> >>> Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to be >>> part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do >>> graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first? >> Pardon >>> me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every >>> suggestion is more than welcome. >>> >>> Roberto >> >>
