I wrote: > I don't think so, but I am probably completely missing the point. > Let's start all over. I have a patched kernel, and I want to have > low latency. I use latest alsa (cvs), and I run the latency test. > (As you might have noticed, I submitted an filtersweep effect for > the latency test, which Jaroslav added to the CVS. Try it with -e) > > - if I run in nonblock mode, it eats all CPU. Latency is excellent, > but it would be nice if I could do something else in the meantime, > for example run a GUI. > $ latency -m 128 -M 128 > - if I run in block mode, i get XRUNs, even with larger bufsize > $ latency -e -b -m 256 -M 256 > - if I run in poll mode, idem > $ latency -e -b -m 256 -M 256 -p
Even with higher values this problems occur, though less frequently. Maarten _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
