Paul Davis wrote: > Ah, OK. yes, i suppose this might not be clear. > [...]
But you made it completely clear now! Thank you very much, Paul. Paul Davis wrote also: > but its basically fairly easy to get this performance out of > any program that is engineered properly. latency.c is not the > correct place to start such a program from, however. its a test > tool, not a viable application. And this is the source of all problems: I thought it was a good idea to use latency.c as a starting point. It would be nice if there would be a small low latency i/o with some processing (yes, that would be a more appropriate place for the filtersweep, wouldn't it?) example in the alsa-lib/test. Maarten _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
