>>Here's the latest. >> >>http://www.boosthardware.com/LAU/alsa/index5-pd.html > >I liked better the version which had the explanation of the >project. What were its problems? I.e., why it was taken off?
i didn't "take it off". i tried to rewrite it so that it didn't sound as if we were just starting out. ALSA isn't complete, but its hardly in a "still working on the basic design" phase. i thought the text should reflect this so that first-time visitors would get a better feeling for it as a working system. the old description sounded to me like a reflection of where ALSA was a year or two ago. >This new page is too wide. Could the title be broken to two lines? >Then title's height would match the height of the logos. Sounds good to me. > Two line explanation........and link to more information I tried hard to write a two line explanation, but I couldn't. > OSS Combat short ^^^^^^^^^^ I think its very VERY VERY important that this not be presented this way. ALSA offers binary OSS compatibility with no modifications needed (except for some OSS-mmap apps like quake) Nothing extra is needed to make them work. the OSS compat library does a *lot* more than provide OSS compatibility. we need a new name for it that reflects it capabilities (routing OSS apps through alsa-lib). we do not want anyone imagining they have to relink their apps to get them to work with ALSA, since thats not true. --p _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
