> .... So, i think there's a time to code THEN there a time > to build docs (the doxygen sections in code are oftenly updated). > > This is why i think there is a non-sense in this *advandage* > of OSS here.
I don't agree. Good documentation is essential and I see the lack of it as a serious problem for ALSA. > Why waiting, help them, if you have time, if you want help the > world. I'm pretty sure if you try another time, you will get feedback > from Alsa devels and Alsa client devels to write a nice Alsa > Programmer's > Guide, since alsa09 is largely used in native mode. It's not that easy to write documentation without documentation. This would be best done by the people who wrote the API I think. It would take some time, but then again it is a matter of where the priorities are. I think documentation is very important, and in the long run would gain other developers' contribution and make life easier for the ALSA core developer team. > This mean, critisism is so easy, helping people is another > story. And yes, the message is better, less offending (as my point > of view, even if i'm not an Alsa devel (lucky are they ;-) ). The message did not seem offending to me. Your message on the other hand struck me as a little rude. --martijn _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
