On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:18:51 +0200 Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > > <...> > > I think we should have a section on the web site for the different > > applications which support different alsa versions. > > > > NOOOO. could we please please please annihilate every last little > trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ? > if that's the stable release, people should be using kernel 1.2 on > an 8086 (as everyone knows, that's the stable release of the > pentium). > > if it has to be, add a very small link to *OBSOLETE* releases and > apps that use them, but please not on the front page. i don't know > how often i have told newbies who had just freshly installed > "stable" to ditch it and start over with 0.9... > > i don't see why jaroslav has sticked to this stable/unstable naming > scheme so long, but probably he had too many other things to do. > patrick, please fix this asap. > > set_rant_mode(off); > > really like the new site. good to see it maintained, and the three > main links for different interest groups are an excellent idea. > > jörn > > I second the motion, alsa 0.5.x not only is way more unstable than 0.9.x in all the cards i've tried it with (and specially sblive) but more incompatible. I think "obsolete" will fit perfect for it. Juan Linietsky _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
