Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:14:09 +0200, > Anders Torger wrote: > > > > Uhhh... I guess ignoring me works just as well :-) > > not ignored but pending :) > > Abramo, do you still have objection to change the default behavior? > > i don't mind that even the new behavior is optional e.g. via > snd_pcm_sw_params. but i believe the current behavior is not expected > as a normal one, so it's enough reason to change it. > > also, if someone (Tim?) already has a patch, please send it here. > it seems my last patch doesn't work properly...
For what it worths my objections are still there. I'm strongly convinced that to have poll waiting for something that cannot happens is a big mistake (also as an optional behaviour). That apart I'm sure that to make a change in actual behaviour between rcX and 1.0 is a professional suicide. However it's _your_ professional suicide so... ;-))) To resume, if you ask me, the answer is no. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
