At Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:00:35 +0100 (MET), Clemens Ladisch wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Clemens Ladisch wrote: > > > The snd_seq_midisynth_register_port() function already knows the name of > > > the rawmidi device, so there is no reason to invent another name for the > > > sequencer client. > > > > the reason was that many rawmidi devices give the same name even if > > there are many. for example, mpu401 sets only "MPU-401 (UART)" as its > > name. > > although the card can be distinguished by the client number, it would > > be better to be able to know only from its name string. > > The maybe we could add the card number or id to the string. > "MPU-401 (card42)" would be better than "External MIDI 42-0".
ok, now, the question is whether this "(cardx)" is included in each rawmidi name or put in seq_midi.c. if we use the rawmidi name with the card id, each rawmidi creator should be responsible. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel