On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:37:35PM -0500, Brian Victor wrote: > > Likewise, I was under the impression that queues handled sequencing > events by timestamp if they arrived in non-sequential order. Is that > so?
Yes, the sequencer's priority queues automatically order the events enqueued by timestamp. > Do I just need to stay ahead of the queue for this to work? Does > that mean, I can't reliably send the queue all events for one voice, > followed by all events for another voice? Because of memory sizes for the event pool, this depends on the number of events you want to enqueue. Of course you'll need to stay ahead of the queue or the event wil be emitted immediately (when T[scheduled] < T[queue head]). Yes, you can enqueue all events for one voice followed by next voices as long as you do not exceed the size of the queue. In practice you'll enqueue the events for a (small) timeframe, eg. one bar, and let the sequencer handle the scheduling. Frank. -- +---- --- -- - - - - | Frank van de Pol -o) A-L-S-A | [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\\ Sounds good! | http://www.alsa-project.org _\_v | Linux - Why use Windows if we have doors available? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
