At Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:43:52 +0100,
Tais M. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thursday 23 January 2003 19:07, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > thanks.
> > > > it seems really the index value was not updated correctly by the
> > > > chip.
> > > > ok, take 4:  please try the new one...
> > > Same as before, log output attached. :)
> > the next one is to put all logs to /var/log/debug.
> > and will show more verbose.
> 
> Ok, log output attached, 3 files with loads of gibberish ;). Same behavior 
> btw.

thanks.  sigh, this chip is really weird.
perhaps in the last patch, the recoverd pointer overtook the actual
pointer and got the driver confused.

take 6:  the calculation of recovered pointer is changed.
         and the register value of CURRPTR is shown as reference.
         if it's more acculate, we can refer to it instead...

as usual, debug messages appear by enabling DEBUG_POITNER.


Takashi

Attachment: via-pointer-test6.dif
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to