At Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:06:22 +0100, Marc Titinger wrote: > > Hi All, > > I can't figure out from the code what are the implications of having > the flag SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BLOCK_TRANSFER set in a > snd_pcm_hardware_t.info field ?
this is an inherited flag from the older version, and plays no big role now. it's still checked in the OSS emulation code, though. > is this flag linked to the values of .period_bytes_min/max or .fifo_size ? no. > is this related to the hw_ptr granularity ? no. hw_ptr granularity is defined only by period_bytes_min (and additional constraints if any). Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
