Frank Barknecht wrote:
> I'm getting a bit tired from being Edirol's laboratory animal. Why
> didn't they implement the standard they wrote?

The Windows USB audio driver (tries to) handle all devices marked as
standard compatible. If a device offers capabilities which are implemented
buggily or not at all in Microsoft's driver (such as MIDI in Win2K), it
has to be marked as "vendor-specific" to prevent the Microsoft driver from
loading so that the vendor's bug-free driver can access the device.

> It says: "Sub=03 Prot=00 Driver=(None)" at the Edirol, whereas the
> other interfaces are claimed by snd-usb-audio.

That's a bug in my patch. I'll have to rewrite it.


HTH
Clemens




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel

Reply via email to