Frank Barknecht wrote: > I'm getting a bit tired from being Edirol's laboratory animal. Why > didn't they implement the standard they wrote?
The Windows USB audio driver (tries to) handle all devices marked as standard compatible. If a device offers capabilities which are implemented buggily or not at all in Microsoft's driver (such as MIDI in Win2K), it has to be marked as "vendor-specific" to prevent the Microsoft driver from loading so that the vendor's bug-free driver can access the device. > It says: "Sub=03 Prot=00 Driver=(None)" at the Edirol, whereas the > other interfaces are claimed by snd-usb-audio. That's a bug in my patch. I'll have to rewrite it. HTH Clemens ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel