Takashi, Thanks for the fast response. Can you give me the exact format for adding the module options? I'm not sure which module to add this to, nor have I ever added module options by hand before. Please be clear as I am not a software person. /etc/modules.conf? Which line?
Thanks, Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:56 AM > To: Mark Knecht > Cc: Alsa-Devel > Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] aplay: pcm_write:1025: write error & > SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PREPAREfailed:device or resource busy > > > At Mon, 2 Jun 2003 06:41:12 -0700, > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > > Takashi, > > While I find this interesting, it doesn't address the > problem. I sent a > > bunch of information and data in the last two emails. Have I > sent what you > > need? Are you able to make any assessment about why aplay will > not work with > > this this sound chip on my Asus motherboard? > > well, i'm still not sure how can it happen. > it looks like an unusual case. > > anyway, in general, BIOS on some ASUS boards have a bug, and the first > PCM device won't work on them. > > could you try to add the module option dxs_support=2 or 3 ? > the option 2 will disable the DXS channel support and works as > VIA8233A chip. the option 3 suppresses the sample rate 48k only. > > > Takashi > > > > > With best regards, > > Mark > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Takashi Iwai > > > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:12 AM > > > To: Mark Knecht > > > Cc: Alsa-Devel > > > Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] aplay: pcm_write:1025: write error & > > > SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PREPAREfailed:device or resource busy > > > > > > > > > At 29 May 2003 21:43:39 -0700, > > > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > > > > > > Sorry this is a bit long. Mostly just data. I hope it helps > figure this > > > > out. Sort of strange that the chip is identified in one place as a > > > > VIA8233 and in another place as a VIA8235.... > > > > > > in fact, both VIA8233 and 8235 have the same PCI ID. that's why lspci > > > shows the same name (while 8235 has the revision 0x50). > > > > > > > > > Takashi > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay > > > Get office equipment for less on eBay! > > > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Alsa-devel mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
