On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> Lisp should be fine, although it's not very user-friendly. But what the
> interpreter is supposed to do ? Is it possible to create an ordinary
> mixer control that the hw doesn't support ? For example: a card may not
> have an hw master volume control, but the ordinary mixer has to provide
> it. Is the lisp config file generic enough to provide a function to
> emulate the master volume control it by changing the volume controls
> of all single channels ? It's not trivial at all to do such a thing
> with a "normal" config file, but it's possible with an interpreter. The
> question is: is it worth the effort ? Or is it better to force all
> lowlevel drivers to provide a minimal set of ordinary controls ?
I think that it's worth to let define multiple virtual mixer devices for
multichannel cards (if required) and I can find more examples in this
area. You cannot do that in the kernel space without adding more code and
this is exactly what we do not want.
Jaroslav
-----
Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, SuSE Labs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
