At Mon, 7 Jul 2003 12:42:13 +0200, p z oooo wrote: > > I know about this, but for me is simpler to add 20 DSP instruction > than change 100 lines of driver code. i think the pass-thru on audigy can be implemented more easily without using TRAM. it doesn't need any change of driver codes, but only a new DSP routing, i guess.
> ALSA emu10k1 driver uses only TRAM for AC3 passthrough, other method > is not implemented. > > And I don't need (I don't have receiver) AC3 passthrough (this will > by bonus for others), what I need is working TRAM on Audigy. yeah, of course, it would be great if we support TRAM generally :) BTW, i've never heard/seen the info of TRAM on audigy, too. so, i believe there is no official information about that yet. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
