At Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:56:38 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > > Can you point me at the code you used to detect it. I have some code > > here that is supposed to detect it, and I just want to compare it with > > your previous code before I bother sending it as a patch. > > Cheers > > James > > > > > P.S. The code I have depends on the contents of AC97 register 0x6e. > Source of this code is: - > http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/dlac97-2.aspx?lineid=5&famid=12&series=8&Software=True > > > Then download the Linux driver. It is a version of the alsa kernel > drivers, but with modifications. > > /* reg = contents of AC97 reg 0x6e */ > switch(ac97->id & 0xfffffff0) { > > <snip> > > case 0x414c4720: // ALC650 > if (((reg & 0x3f) > 0) && ((reg & 0x3f) < 3)) > ac97->id = 0x414c4720; // Early version. > else if (((reg & 0x3f) > 2) && ((reg & 0x3f) < 0x10)) > ac97->id = 0x414c4721; // D version > else if ((reg&0x30) == 0x10) > ac97->id = 0x414c4722; // E version > else if ((reg&0x30) == 0x20) > ac97->id = 0x414c4723; // F version > break;
oh, then it's apparently different. i checked MULTICH register bits but it didn't work anyway. the above looks better (hey where is such a thing described!). could you send me a patch? Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
