Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Stephen Cook wrote:
> >
> > >> - qsort(hctl->pelems, hctl->count, sizeof(*hctl->pelems), compar);
> > >> +
> > >> + pthread_mutex_lock(&sync_lock);
> > >> + compare_hctl = hctl;
> > >> + qsort(hctl->pelems, hctl->count, sizeof(*hctl->pelems), hctl_compare);
> > >> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&sync_lock);
> >
> > I hope I don't sound to persistent but I am just wondering when this
> > patch is going to be merged or if there is anything I can do to help
> > speed it up. Such as any changes to the patch etc.
>
> well, i'm also waiting for the response from others.
Looks fine.
We're already dependent on pthreads, and qsort doesn't pass extra
parameters, so I don't see any better way to do this.
("Let's write our own sorting routine" is not better IMNSHO.)
Regards,
Clemens
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
