On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:11:23AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > we released packages 1.0.2.
>
> The current tree from kernel.org claims in linux/include/sound/version.h
> that only Alsa 0.9.7 is integrated. Is that correct?
Another point: With the release of 1.0, I really think that ALSA should
be integrated into 2.4 (while Marcelo still accepts such updates).
Reasoning: 2.4 isn't going to die for quite a while and having a uniform
way of ALSA integration into the various distros would be helpful
(does RedHat aka Fedora habe ALSA support by now?)
It would also send a clear message to developers that ALSA is the way to
go, not OSS and ALSA with the 1.0 API and not something older (Wine comes
to my mind).
ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
