On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Russell King wrote: > > > I suggest we add a load of preprocessor junk into the ALSA core and > > comment exactly _why_ its needed, thereby laying the reason completely > > at the door of these ill-defined APIs where questions have been asked > > and responses not been received. > > I'm thinking to prepare more or less complete patch for all > architectures and send it to LKML for a discussion.
The problem is that not all architecture maintainers are on lkml. Besides, I've tried talking to the architecture maintainers - their complete silence since two weeks ago indicates that they just don't want to know about this issue. As I said on the architecture alias - I've put enough non-rewarding time into this issue. I also have various commercial deadlines coming up, so I couldn't work on it even if I wanted to. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
