On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Russell King wrote:
> 
> > I suggest we add a load of preprocessor junk into the ALSA core and
> > comment exactly _why_ its needed, thereby laying the reason completely
> > at the door of these ill-defined APIs where questions have been asked
> > and responses not been received.
> 
> I'm thinking to prepare more or less complete patch for all 
> architectures and send it to LKML for a discussion.

The problem is that not all architecture maintainers are on lkml.

Besides, I've tried talking to the architecture maintainers - their
complete silence since two weeks ago indicates that they just don't
want to know about this issue.

As I said on the architecture alias - I've put enough non-rewarding
time into this issue.  I also have various commercial deadlines
coming up, so I couldn't work on it even if I wanted to.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel

Reply via email to