On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:26:38PM +0200, Martin Langer wrote: > This bunch of patches fixes compiler warnings like these one: > pcm_multi.c:646: warning: missing initializer > pcm_multi.c:646: warning: (near initialization for > snd_pcm_multi_ops.poll_revpcm_shm.c:589: warning: missing initializer for > snd_pcm_multi_ops.poll_revents') > > But perhaps more interesting values than NULL are prefered.... Please review > before applying it.
gcc 2.95.4 and 3.0.4ive this warning, but 3.2.3 and 3.3.3 do not (with -Wall -W, at least). I think a large point of using this C99 syntax is to only initialize what you want, and not clutter the code with lots of redundant NULL initialization. -- Glenn Maynard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
