At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:57:13 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > i need some clarifying about how the defines ALSA_PCM_OLD_HW_PARAMS_API > etc. behaves. > for alsa-1.x its clear that if the app uses the new api i have to define > ALSA_PCM_NEW_HW_PARAMS_API,
no, with ALSA 1.x, the new API is chosen as default. > but what is for the case if i have an app with > the new api and the user uses only alsa9? if user recompiles the code with the old API, he has to add ALSA_PCM_OLD_* defines. > is alsa1.x then backwards > compatible? yes. the alsa-lib contains the versioned symbols for the backward comptibility. Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
