[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:26, Don Levey wrote;
>
>   > This doesn't appear to be the case.  Am I asking for the ALSA
>   > developers to obtain and test every sound boadr on the market,
>   > every chipset?  Not at all.  I wouldn't mind some sort of clear
>   > chart, as has been suggested, specifying just WHAT is *fully*
>   > supported/tested.  Another section, "should work", would be nice,
>   > as well as a "don't hold your breath" section.
>
> Great.  So, go help build or resurrect a site which will help users
> co-ordinate their testing results for their hardware!
>

Sure - I'd love to.  Of course, I don't have the bandwidth to host a site
like that, and I'm not really a web designer, but I'd like to help in that
if possible.

>   > This should be a reasonable request - the developers should know
>   >against which hardware they test, what passes and what fails.  The
>
> Hmm.  Unfortunately the developers can only test on the one or two
> pieces of hardware that they use.  I don't think it's reasonable to
> expect them to personally collaborate testing results from potentially
> thousands of users.  Maybe 20 users say "it works perfectly", when
> what they mean is "stereo output at 44kHz is audible when connected to
> the speaker out, I haven't exhaustively tested everything else".
>
How about publishing the tests that they DO run?  If a developer is writing
and testing using, say, a Turtle Beach Montego II, then tell us that this is
the case.  At the very least I would know that this boadr has a good chance
of working for me.  If you've got a specific motherboard with on-board
sound, tell me.  Or the chipset, or whatever.  The ALSA project home page is
a great place for this, and has a lot of information - and could have more.

>   >middle section, the best-guess list, would probably be the
>   >hardest.  Oh, and as long as I'm dreaming, it would be nice to see
>   >a clear and simple explanation of how to tell what chipset is on
>   >your card, so that we can refer to that instead of the
>   >manufacturer's model number.
>
> As long as it's a PCI card, `lspci'.  I usually then just google for
> the device ID :) (`lspci -n' will not convert the ID to a name).
> There isn't a 1<->1 correspondance between device IDs and chipsets,
> but usually you'll find your answer from there.

OK, that's a good place to start - thanks!  I don't come into this knowing a
whole heck of a lot, but I can learn.  I just can't make that learning a
full time job+; I've got 1.5 of those and a family (as, I'm sure, many
others have too).

 -Don



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user

Reply via email to