On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 01:06 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > I think you are missing the point. > > I am not suggesting to describe all cards fully. > > I am saying that if ALSA developers have already implemented SOME > commutation, connectivity, gain control, sample rate control, they > DO ALREADY KNOW the data necessary to be supplied with/into the proposed > HAL. > > So we, end users, won't have to ask about enabling capture, or gain > control, or SPDIFF through, etc, it will be instead in the HAL > instance/realization of the card (if the features are implemented, of > course), and the (mixer + its GUI) generation application taking that > HAL instance will generate the necessary mixer automatically - just for > known (i.e. implemented) functionality. > > The question is whether C++ is good for this (HAL) or some other less > strict type language should be used. > > And, of course, ALSA developers know better than us all what are the real > possibilities in cards.
Sounds interesting. Patches are welcome. This should be discussed further on alsa-devel. Lee ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
