CoApp is designed more for end user scenarios where users want to run an MSI to install some peice of OSS. I don't think it would make much sense for it to be used in the development process.
On Jan 13, 10:57 am, Paul McCallick <[email protected]> wrote: > I hadn't heard of openWrap, thanks. > > CoApp hasn't had a check in since November, nu is a similar story. openWrap > looks pretty active. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Lee Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> This list introduced me to nu, which uses gem to do package management > > in a > > >> .net friendly way. Nice. Apparently, nu begat nuGet, and the nu > > >> contributers shifted focus to nuGet. > > > Fun, thanks. Does anyone have a comparison of Nu to OpenWrap and/or MS > > CoApp? > > >https://github.com/openrasta/openwrap > >http://coapp.org/ > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<altnetseattle%2Bunsubscribe@goog > > legroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. > > -- > --Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
