What hacks do you see as needed for implementing REST via MVC?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Ryan Riley
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Paul McCallick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> This came in on InfoQ today:
>> http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/01/WCF-HTTP
>> It's very timely for us, as we're planning to abandon WCF in favor of
>> straight ASP.NET MVC.  I don't see the value add of WCF when all you're
>> trying to do is expose a REST interface.  Does anyone see the point in this?
>
> I think a few links are sufficient:
> http://deadprogrammersociety.blogspot.com/2007/10/sinatra-ruby-web-framework-and-why-it.html
> http://groups.google.com/group/net-http-abstractions
> http://rubylearning.com/blog/2009/03/20/interview-ryan-tomayko-on-sinatra/
>
> Why do I reference Sinatra? It's the oldest of the new form of web
> frameworks coming out, and the WCF Web APIs align more tightly with it.
>
> MVC is certainly a valid approach. However, if you want to do REST and not
> just REST-ish, MVC doesn't quite cut the mustard, at least not without some
> hacks.
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to