Ahh gotcha! Glad I asked lol. I like that more because people don't have to ask to get access but they'll have to ask to publish changes. I'd really like to reduce the iteration friction. The asking friction seems to be pretty low at this point.
I'm willing to bet on our community that we don't even run into a single outage. We all know how important the site is and will be testing it locally. I don't think anyone wants to be *THAT* dev. Also, since we can all help out, I'm expecting any unexpected WTF to be more readily and quickly addressed. Us organizers are busier than hell. I love experiments that feel all risky :) Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Ryan Riley <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Justin Bozonier <[email protected]>wrote: > So the wild west nature scares you a bit? > > Just want to make sure I understand the issues before I address them. :) > No, I'm very much wild west myself. If the site going down isn't a big deal, then we're fine. :) I just thought it might be a slightly better workflow, if more involved. Been thinking about these things a lot lately. :-D Ryan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
