+ requirements: draft-kiesel-alto-reqs was discussed during the
last twomeetings, but it seems there is still no fundamental
agreement in the WG about the approach the requirements document
should adopt. The situation has now been stale since Minneapolis:
if you want to contribute to this work and have an opinion, this is
the very right time to let the group hear it;
It's close, but I'm not sure yet. I've missed previous discussions,
so please forgive any retreads. .
This is a reminder to folks on this list that we have
assiduously archived the previous alto discussion (at 73rd
IETF).
For those who are looking to catch up on the discussions
on problem-statement and requirements (since these are
the two high-runners right now), please see the alto wiki
page (URL below) that has links to each individual audio
session, correspondent slideshow, and correspondent minutes.
The URL for the archives of the alto session at the 73rd IETF is:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/trac/wiki
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
