Dear Gustavo, > Our idea is to avoid > defining new discovery protocols and reuse the existing ones > describing how they can be applied to the ALTO use case. >
We have the same thought, and that's also what we did in draft-song-alto-server-discovery. Regards, Haibin > BR, > G. > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of > songhaibin 64081 [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [alto] ALTO server discovery > > Hi all, > > We also submit an ALTO server discovery draft. Here is the link: > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-song-alto-server-discovery-00.txt > > Now there are two drafts on ALTO server discovery. I think they > have commonness and differences. Our draft mainly focuses on the > scenario where network operators provide the alto servers. The > solution has the consideration for residential gateways when using > DHCP option to retrieve the alto service name. We also take into > account the discovery process by end terminals and application > trackers(or proxies). These two drafts can be of compleme > ntary to each other. > > Any comments are appreciated! > > Best Regards! > Song Haibin > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
