Hello, I agree with Reinaldo on this point. Any aggregation ID or other indirect ID implying ASN or other group relationships could be used as a selection.
Best regards, - Yan > Hello, > > I think what you are asking is this: > > If the ALTO protocol uses any type of indirect aggregation (ASNs, PID, etc) > as opposed to plain prefixes, does the ALTO Server needs to expand them? I do > no think this issue is specific to ASNs. > > As long as you have the proper interfaces /query mechanism in place, it seems > to me you are free to use an aggregation method that suits your deployment. > The ALTO Protocol draft and the presentation at the last IETF provided > examples on PIDs usage and resolution. But that could be ASNs or any other > aggregation. > > Thanks, > > Reinaldo > > > On 4/21/09 1:16 AM, "Sebastian Kiesel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to mandate that the second line has to be expanded > to the corresponding cidr lines at the ALTO server side, to ensure that > the ALTO client does not have to deal with AS numbers? > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
