Folks, the meeting in Hiroshima and the mailing list followup have indicated that there is rough consensus for adopting the draft as the basis for the request/response protocol deliverable we have in the charter. From now on, not the individual authors, but the whole WG will be in charge of the document -- that will be renamed draft-ietf-alto-protocol -- and will take control of the changes.
The observations raised during the meeting and after on the list have pointed out several areas where the current text may (and indeed needs to) be improved. They have also indicated some issues that certainly need more discussion. Since we are now at a fresh start, we would like the current authors and the whole group to consider the possibility to adopt a systematic approach at tracking issues on this document, possibly using the IETF issue tracker tool (for an idea of how the tool works take a look at: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/query?component=p1-messaging). If you have an opinion whether such a tool would in fact improve productivity, please let the chairs know. -- Ciao, Enrico
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
