Song Haibin wrote: > I'm concern about the logic between (3a), (3b) and (3c). Like Enrico > said, ALTO servers SHOULD NOT provide anyone with information they don't > want to get redistributed. Then I don't see any necessary to encrypt the > ALTO information.
No, wait, there's a bug in this reasoning. Encryption is still very necessary to preserve user privacy, i.e. to let an ALTO server provide a user with information the user themselves may consider confidential (e.g. their own uplink/downlink capacity). But of course if the user is willing to redistribute even such potentially-confidential information, there is no means for the server to prevent that. -- Ciao, Enrico
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
