You may want to make some of these tracker notes more verbose. In any case, was your objective to make the request and response simpler or what's in body of the <ALTOResponse> itself?
And depending upon the case, which section of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-protocol-03 would you like targeted comments on? (7.5?) Thanks Jason On 3/8/10 7:57 PM, "alto issue tracker" <[email protected]> wrote: > #1: Message > format ---------------------------------------------+------------------------- > ----- Reporter: enrico.maro...@ | Owner: > richard.al...@ Type: enhancement | > Status: assigned Priority: blocker | > Milestone: Component: protocol > | Version: Severity: Active WG Document > | Keywords: > ---------------------------------------------+------------------------------ > Changes (by richard.al...@): * status: new => assigned Comment: > draft-ietf-alto-protocol-03 now uses a more concise representation (using > C-style structs) for formally specifying protocol structure. Still leaving > this issue open since there has been no discussion yet in the WG regarding > the messaging. -- Ticket URL: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/trac/ticket/1#comment:2> alto > <http://tools.ietf.org/alto/> _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
