BTW, I've created a ticket in the Issue Tracker related to Error codes in the 
protocol to track this discussion.

I agree that we still need to use HTTP status codes for exactly the reason you 
mentioned.

-- 
Richard Alimi
Department of Computer Science
Yale University

On Thursday 18 March 2010 9:38:10 am Woundy, Richard wrote:
> Martin, I assume in your proposal that ALTO would still leverage the
> appropriate HTTP error codes as well as add ALTO error codes /
> information?
> 
> I think we want to keep the HTTP error codes so that intermediaries (eg
> caches) handle errors the right way as well.
> 
> -- Rich
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu Mar 18 07:29:18 2010
> Subject: [alto] Error handling in the ALTO protocol (-03)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> While reading draft-ietf-alto-protocol-03 is stumbled over the error
> handling.
> 
> It seems that the error handling of ALTO relies on the http error codes,
> but does not provide its own error code or proceed.
> 
> I see this a shortcoming of the current design and also as not favourably.
> 
> This mixes transport related error messages (e.g., 404 not found, i.e., the
> general alto resource your asking for isn't here) and errors related the
> actual ALTO handling (e.g., asking guidance for private or reserved IP
> addresses that cannot be rated by ALTO, syntax errors, or not understood
> objects).
> 
> My proposal:
> - separate both levels clearly
> - define an error object for cases where no or only a partial answer can be
> given - define that the server can deliver some information he has
> understood (e.g., some IP addresses) within the given semantics, as
> defined in the draft as is.
> 
>   Martin
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
> NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London
> W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to