Interesting. I certainly see value in such mechanism for Tracker/CDN based networks. Given the developments in HTTPby you might not even need a new connection for such deployments.
Thanks, Reinaldo On 4/16/10 8:56 AM, "wangaijun" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alimi, > > We have discussed about our > draft(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sun-alto-notification-00.txt) for short > time in IETF meeting in Anaheim. It a pity we did not get the chance to > illustrate the prepared ppt(see attached file)in this meeting. > > After this meeting, I discussed your comments with my colleagues, and we > still think the "server notification" mechanism should be incorporated into > the current ALTO protocol. It may act as one optional implementation, and > mainly aim at the tracker-based environment. For tracker-less application, > if one PID head was elected as described in draft > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ikpark-alto-virtual-p2ptracker-00.txt, > the notification mechanism can also applied to it, on the assumption that it > has the public IP address. These implementation can certainly reduce the > burden of the ALTO server and let the ALTO clients get the ALTO information > timely. This eventually will let the p2p traffic to keep up with the > adjustment pace of ISP's policy. > > Wait for you and other interested persons' comments. If possible, we can > discuss it in the coming " Interim Virtual Meeting " or next IETF plenary > meeting. > > Best regards. > > > Wang Aijun > Network Infrastructure Research Division > Network and Service Research Department > China Telecom Coporation Beijing Research Institute > > > ============================================================================ > ======== > Today's Topics: > > 1. Interim Virtual Meeting (Enrico Marocco) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:36:11 +0200 > From: Enrico Marocco <[email protected]> > Subject: [alto] Interim Virtual Meeting > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi all, > > as mentioned during the last meeting, we plan to have an interim WebEx > meeting between Anaheim and Maastricht. The date we have identified is June > 16, but it may still be subject to change. > > In particular, we would like to focus the meeting on progressing the work on > the protocol document, info redistribution, deployment considerations and > v4/v6 issues. If anyone would like to propose other topics, please check > well in advance with the chairs. > > An official email from the IETF secretariat will follow in the following > weeks. > > -- > Ciao, > Enrico > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: smime.p7s > Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature > Size: 5162 bytes > Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature > Url : > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/attachments/20100415/18b44c56/att > achment.bin> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > > > End of alto Digest, Vol 18, Issue 6 > *********************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
