thanks, Richard, i can understand the difference:）.
what do u think about why the traffic generated by other applications was
increased while the P2P application traffic was decreased by deploying
alto?
and after deploying P2P cache, we can see the outbound traffic was reduced
less than the decreased traffic without P2P cache. how do you understand
this point?
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------+
| No |Data Item |Description |The way of |
| | | |collection |
+----+---------- -+------------------------+-----------------------+
| 1 |Outbound |Decreased 40Gbps, Collecting max average |
| |bandwidth |about 54.47% of total outbound traffic of |
| | |Xunlei outbound traffic |a day from the DPI |
| | | |system |
+----+------------+------------------------+-----------------------+
| |Inbound/ |outbound bandwidth |Collecting max average |
| 2 |outbound |decreased 39.18Gbps |inbound/outbound |
| |bandwidth |inbound bandwidth traffic of a day from |
| | |decreased 28.3 Gbps |the snmp system |
+----+------------+------------------------+-----------------------+
| 3 |Average |From 279KBps up to |Collection from Xunlei |
| |download |294.5KBps |OAM system |
| |speed | | |
+----+------------+------------------------+-----------------------+
在 2010年7月12日 下午12:56，Y. R. Yang <[email protected]>写道：
> Hi Xiao,
>
> My understanding is that "1" is *Xunlei* outbound traffic detected by DPI;
> "2" is *total* traffic (of all application types). Due to reduction of
> Xuelei traffic, an operator may have a concern that other types of
> applications may take over the reduction and thus there is no reduction in
> total traffic. I think it is great that the trial reports both numbers. From
> the table, it seems that some other applications may have taken over some of
> the 42.77Gbps reduction (42.77Gbps - 31.58Gbps), if the two max values
> happen at the same instance of time. If not, it will be a bit trickier to
> interpret.
>
> Kai and Roger: can you please confirm?
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 7/11/2010 8:45 AM, 朱潇 wrote:
>
> hi, likai
>
> what is the differences between the two "outbound bandwidth" described in
> the data item?
>
> +------------------------------------------+-----------------------+
> | No |Data Item |Description |The way of |
> | | | |collection |
> +----+---------- -+------------------------+-----------------------+
> | 1 |Outbound |Decreased 42.77Gbps, Collecting max average |
> | |bandwidth |about 50.61% of total outbound traffic of |
> | | |Xunlei outbound |a day from the DPI |
> | | |traffic |system |
> +----+------------+------------------------+-----------------------+
> | |Inbound/ |outbound bandwidth |Collecting max average |
> | 2 |outbound |decreased 31.58Gbps |inbound/outbound |
> | |bandwidth |inbound bandwidth traffic of a day from |
> | | |decreased 10.46Gbps |the snmp system |
> +----+------------+------------------------+-----------------------+
>
>
>
> 2010/7/6 Likai <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi all:
>>
>> We had a trial in ChinaTelecom’s real network base on ALTO and DECADE
>> mechanism in past 12 months. It’s my pleasure to share the trial experience
>> with ALTO and DECADE working group. We invite you for a discussion about the
>> draft.
>>
>> We propose this draft to be a BCP document of ALTO if ALTO will do some
>> re-charter. If there is any problem please let me know.
>>
>> You can find the trial draft here:
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-lee-alto-chinatelecom-trial-00.txt
>>
>> Thanks for your time
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Kai lee and Kaiyu Zhou, on behalf of all authors
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best wishes,
>
> Beijing University of Posts & Telecommunications (BUPT)
> Zhu Xiao ( 朱潇 )
> E-mail: [email protected]
> mobile:+86 134-8881-9004
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
>
>
> --
> Richard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
>
--
Best wishes,
Beijing University of Posts & Telecommunications (BUPT)
Zhu Xiao ( 朱潇 )
E-mail: [email protected]
mobile:+86 134-8881-9004
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
