On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 10:34 AM, Richard Alimi wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I am missing something, but in Test Case 1, should it read
>> "Server returns the following directory or one with equivalent
>> Information Resources"? Or, is there a reason for server
>> implementations to use a particular resource entry layout and URIs?
>
> Rich: It is not expected that all servers return the response in
> the format shown in the test document. Server implementations will
> vary in how they marshal up the payload, as long as it is
> syntactically valid and semantically equivalent to any other
> response.
>
> I have added your suggestion to Test Case 1, in any case.
Okay - I expected JSON format (member ordering, whitespace, etc) to be
up to the implementation, but just wanted to be clarify that the
server didn't have to choose its resource -> URI mapping as well.
Semantically equivalent at the Information Resource level (not at the
JSON level) sounds good to me :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
> Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
