On 2011-07-28 at 12:33:10, Bill Roome wrote:
> I would appreciate it if you could explain how my proposal increases 
> the coupling between the client and the server.

I apologise, your proposal did not increase coupling.  'twas the expression of 
philosophy that caused the allergic reaction.

Thinking on it more, the technical proposal - that a directory can identify 
other directories - is perfectly fine.  It's suboptimal, given that the first 
directory could just as easily include the second, but it's perfectly sound.

There's a problem with resources that don't support GET, which is one of the 
cases where you get 300 responses and where you need OPTIONS requests.  But the 
general guidance there is to avoid the creation of resources that don't do GET.

--Martin


_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to