Enrico, I have a question about the jose WG: Is this something the ALTO protocol should consider right now?
I see that this makes technically sense, but we would add a dependency to jose, if we add this to the ALTO protocol right now.
The public of the ALTO protocol would delayed, until the corresponding draft in jose would be published.
Thanks, Martin On 11/11/2011 03:56 PM, Enrico Marocco wrote:
Hi all, people involved in ALTO may also want to attend -- physically or remotely -- a bunch of other meetings next week that have related topics on the agenda. Here's a non-inclusive list: - appsawg, 9:00-11:30 on Monday, will have a WG report from ALTO to the benefit of the app-review team the ALTO specs will be run on, and a discussion about a patch mechanism for JSON (draft-pbryan-json-patch) that may be reused in the ALTO protocol for providing incremental updates; - jose WG, 13:00-15:00 on Monday, will have its first meeting. The WG is chartered to specify an integrity protection mechanism the ALTO protocol may -- and in fact should -- use for information redistribution. It will be important to bring the ALTO perspective to make sure that relevant use cases are properly addressed; - cdni WG, 9:00-11:30 on Wednesday, other than being fundamentally related, has an ALTO-based proposal being presented (draft-seedorf-alto-for-cdni) as a candidate for the request routing interface the WG is chartered to specify. Other sessions that will likely have discussions about ALTO-related topics are decade, ppsp and sdn (BoF). And certainly a ton that I have forgotten and that someone will promptly point out on this list :-) _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
