On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Bill Roome wrote: > 1. Should the ALTO spec forbid "empty" CIDRs in the network map?
> 2. Should the ALTO spec require the CIDRs in a PID to be reduced to > "lowest terms"? My thoughts are "No" and "No", because churn will happen. For the first, the "empty" CIDRs can be effectively catch-all rules, which when a subrule goes in and out may change things. Likewise, I don't see the benefit of mandatory canonicalization/reduction when there is possible churn, which will force the undoing/redoing of the canonicalization. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
