On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Songhaibin <[email protected]> wrote: > In general, this draft is in good shape. > > One randomly caught problem, in Section 5.1.2.2, the ordinal mode > introduction, it says this cost mode is a ranking from a particular source to > a set of destinations. But in Section 5.2, the introduction of cost map > structure, the cost mode "ordinal" can be applied to m*n entries in the cost > map. So I suggest to modify the previous section 5.1.2.2 to make them > consistent. >
Thanks for catching that. In fact, the sentence "If the Cost Mode is 'ordinal', the Path Cost of each communicating pair is relative to the m*n entries" can probably just be removed. Thanks, Rich > BR, > -Haibin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Enrico >> Marocco >> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:20 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [alto] WGLC: draft-ietf-alto-protocol-11 >> >> >> The chairs would like to declare a Working Group Last Call for >> draft-ietf-alto-protocol-11, ending Friday May 11th. >> >> Please do review the latest version of the draft, and send any comments to >> the >> list before the expiry of WGLC so we can get this document ready for the >> IESG. >> >> -- >> Ciao, >> Enrico > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
