On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Bill Roome <[email protected]> wrote:
> {7.7.3.1.5} -- Endpoint Property Response -- says
>
> The ALTO Server MAY include the Version Tag (Section 5.3) of the
> Network Map used to generate the response (if desired and applicable)
> as the 'map-vtag' member in the response. If the 'pid' property is
> returned for any endpoints in the response, the 'map-vtag' member is
> REQUIRED instead of OPTIONAL.
>
>
> However the example in {7.7.3.1.6} doesn't follow that rule. It's
>
>   {
>     "meta" : {},
>     "data": {
>       "ipv4:192.0.2.34"    : { "pid": "PID1" },
>       "ipv4:203.0.113.129" : { "pid": "PID3" }
>     }
>   }
>
>
> where it should be
>
>   {
>     "meta" : {},
>     "data": {
>       "map-vtag" : "1266506139",
>       "ipv4:192.0.2.34"    : { "pid": "PID1" },
>       "ipv4:203.0.113.129" : { "pid": "PID3" }
>     }
>   }
>
>
> But that has an unfortunate complication. Before, all the keys in the "data"
> object were endpoints.
> But now, a key is an endpoint address UNLESS it's "map-vtag". Granted,
> that's not ambiguous, because
> "map-vtag" can't possibly be an endpoint address.
>
> But still it's annoying. Compare that with the a filtered network-map
> response:
>
>    {
>      "meta" : {},
>      "data" : {
>        "map-vtag" : "1266506139",
>        "map" : {
>          "PID1" : {
>            "ipv4" : [ "192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/24" ]
>          },
>          "PID2" : {
>            "ipv4": [ "198.51.100.128/24" ]
>          }
>        }
>      }
>    }
>
> There the PID name keys are all in a "map" object. So for consistency,
> the properties in an endpoint prop response should also be under a "map":
>
>   {
>
>     "meta" : {},
>     "data": {
>       "map-vtag" : "1266506139",
>       "map" : {
>          "ipv4:192.0.2.34"    : { "pid": "PID1" },
>          "ipv4:203.0.113.129" : { "pid": "PID3" }
>       }
>     }
>   }
>
>
> Comments?

Thanks for catching this.  I completely agree with the suggested
approach of putting all of of the properties within a 'map' object.
That seems to be a much cleaner approach.

Thanks,
Rich

>
> - Bill Roome
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to