Yingjie, I had basically the same questions and it seems that Rich Alimi has something in the pipe.
Martin On 07/04/2012 03:23 AM, Guyingjie (Yingjie) wrote: > Hi Martin and all, > The base protocol used to refer to draft-gu-alto-redistribution, and I am one > of the authors, together with Richard and Roni. > Is there any plan for the new dedicated redistribution draft, e.g. > contributors and draft plan? > > I am not very active in ALTO for sometime, so I maybe miss some discussion in > the mail list on redistribution. > Personally, I would suggest to awake the draft-gu-alto-redistribution, since > there is many detail technical considerations for redistribution. Or at least > we should take the Basic requirements and ALTO Redistribution Solutions > Analysis to the new draft if there is any. > > Best Regards > Gu Yingjie > > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Martin > Stiemerling > 发送时间: 2012年7月3日 乐乐21:20 > 收件人: Richard Alimi > 抄送: [email protected] > 主题: Re: [alto] Way forward for the Resdistribution > > > > On 07/02/2012 07:37 PM, Richard Alimi wrote: >> The material has been migrated to another document locally, but it >> isn't yet ready for submission. I don't think it should be >> completely abandoned, but in my opinion the priority is lower than >> getting the base protocol. As was mentioned in the discussion w.r.t. >> requirements, there are some things that it provides such as >> guidelines on which clients should make use of the information and for >> how long (above and beyond what we get for free from HTTP caching). >> >> With your AD hat on, do we need the additional document to be >> explicitly mentioned in the charter? > > It would be good to see this draft submitted. Getting a new milestone > for this is not a big deal if the WG is in agreement. > > Martin > >> >> Rich >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Martin Stiemerling >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have just read the ALTO protocol slides of the meeting in Paris and do >>> wonder what has ultimately happened to the redistribution, as the slide >>> state: >>> >>> "Will be submitted as separate draft that may make use of JOSE" >>> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-alto-2.pdf) >>> >>> This functionality is gone from the base protocol, but we do not have any >>> replacement insight. Do we completely abandon this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Martin >>> -- >>> [email protected] >>> >>> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited >>> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL >>> Registered in England 283 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> alto mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > -- [email protected] NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 283 _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
