On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/06/2012 07:53 PM, Junchang(Jason) Wang wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     2) Use multi-part MIME.  One part is the normal
>>       "application/alto-error+json" and the other part could be
>>       "text/plain" that describes the error in more detail.
>>
>> We can try to implement this in our ALTO server. But whether it's better
>> to mention that in some documents so that clients can follow? In other
>> words, clients should be aware of error description part. Is that right?
>>
>
> Yes, at least aware enough that they decode the multipart MIME and
> render the "text/plain" for human consumption.  But even if they do
> not, the problem is apparent when one uses a packet sniffer (tcpdump,
> wireshark, etc.) to look at the traffic.
>
> From the ease of use perspective, using the Reason-Phrase is probably
> the way to go.
>
> We could probably have an "Implementer's Guide" section in draft-
> gurbani-alto-interop-cases where we provide relevant information.
> Probably best to put it there instead of the protocol document.
>
>
Hi Vijay,

Sounds great. I can implement the Reason-Phrase schema in our ALTO server
soon and deploy it on p4p-1.cs.yale.edu for test.


Thanks.

--Jason
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to