On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:27:42AM +0100, Sebastian Kiesel <[email protected]> wrote a message of 67 lines which said:
> this new version of the ALTO server discovery draft is based on the > feedback we got during WGLC. I know it's late but I still have a question: why using U-NAPTR when S-NAPTR (RFC 3958) would be sufficient? Both examples in the draft -07 use no left-hand part in the regexp (and I do not see what could be used for this part) and therefore would work with S-NAPTR. I find zero discussion on this issue in the archives of the mailing list. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
