I believe this effort is very useful. The i2rs WG is in fact considering the ALTO protocol as a candidate for some of the use cases they are focusing on (see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-amante-i2rs-topology-use-cases-00#section-4.3). The more information ALTO experts can provide to help them make an informed decision, the better. I would encourage anyone who have been involved in the development of the ALTO protocol to coordinate with Haibin and Young, and help people outside the WG understand whether the work done here could be a good match for their needs.
Enrico On 2/19/13 4:17 AM, Songhaibin (A) wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We have submitted a new individual document. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-alto-i2rs-00 > > > > Which is aimed to focus on gathering infrastructure information for ALTO > service. I think it could be called the south bound interface for ALTO. > This document is also related to i2rs wg. Anybody who has the same > interest to contribute is welcome to join us, we plan to give an update > by next Monday. > > > > Regards! > > -Haibin > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
